When designing or evaluating a vessel, stability is paramount. A common measure of initial stability is the metacentric height (), which represents the distance between the center of gravity () and the metacenter (). A larger implies a stronger righting moment and a more stable vessel.
The simplified formula for initial metacentric height is , where is beam width, is draft, is the height of the center of gravity above keel, and is the center of buoyancy above keel. Our calculator assumes draft is half the beam as a rough approximation.
Each symbol in the equation represents a physical dimension you can measure on the hull or compute from plans. Beam width is the distance across the widest part of the boat, draft approximates how deep the hull sits in the water, marks how high the center of gravity lies above the keel, and tracks the center of buoyancy. Subtracting and adding adjusts the geometric term so the final number reflects how the boat actually floats.
A vessel with a positive metacentric height resists small tilts and tends to return upright after being disturbed. Negative values indicate a top-heavy configuration prone to capsizing. Designers strive for an appropriate margin of stability without sacrificing performance or comfort. A high can result in a stiff ride, while a low value may feel more comfortable but risk instability in rough seas.
Static stability deals with these small-angle tilts, while dynamic stability involves how the boat responds to waves and sharp maneuvers. A design can be statically stable yet dynamically risky if weight distribution allows for sudden shifts. Awareness of both perspectives helps skippers avoid surprises when sea conditions change.
Enter the beam width along with the vertical positions of the center of gravity and center of buoyancy. The script calculates the approximate metacentric height. Results above 0.5 meters typically indicate adequate stability for small craft, though exact requirements vary with vessel type and operating conditions.
Real-world stability analysis accounts for loading conditions, free-surface effects, and hull shape. While this calculator provides a quick estimate, marine engineers use detailed models and experiments for certification. Still, the formula offers insight into how design changes—like lowering heavy equipment to reduce —improve safety.
Many maritime authorities publish minimum recommendations. Consulting those guidelines, performing inclining experiments, and logging cargo placement all contribute to a safe voyage.
Imagine a small sailboat with a beam of 3 meters. The center of gravity sits 1 meter above the keel, and the center of buoyancy is at 0.5 meters. Assuming draft equals half the beam (1.5 meters), the calculated metacentric height is around 0.25 meters. This suggests modest stability, so additional ballast or design adjustments may be needed for safe operation in choppy waters.
Beam (m) | KG (m) | KB (m) | GM (m) |
---|---|---|---|
2.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.21 |
3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.25 |
3.5 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.29 |
These values illustrate how widening the beam or lowering the center of gravity increases metacentric height. Use the table as a starting point and adjust the inputs to match your own vessel.
Distribute equipment evenly, secure cargo to prevent shifting, and revisit stability calculations after major modifications. Regular inspections and sea trials reinforce theoretical estimates with real-world performance.
Compute volcanic eruption column height from mass eruption rate and vent elevation using an empirical plume rise model.
Estimate expected detection rates for weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) using detector mass, cross section and dark matter density.
Estimate supersaturation, droplet density and particle track length for a diffusion cloud chamber.