The Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) is a core regulatory metric that compares a bank’s capital to the risks it has taken on. This calculator helps you compute CAR quickly from three inputs you already have or have estimated elsewhere:
The tool is designed for bank risk and finance teams, analysts, regulators, and advanced students who need a fast way to translate capital and RWA figures into a percentage ratio. It assumes that Tier 1, Tier 2, and RWA amounts have already been calculated in line with the applicable regulatory framework (for example, Basel II, Basel III, or a local implementation).
In plain language, the capital adequacy ratio compares a bank’s regulatory capital to its risk-weighted assets:
CAR = (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ÷ Risk-Weighted Assets × 100%
Written in MathML, the formula can be represented as:
Where:
The calculator applies exactly this formula: it sums Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital, divides by RWA, and expresses the result as a percentage.
Tier 1 capital is the primary buffer protecting depositors and senior creditors. It is intended to absorb losses while the bank remains a going concern. Typical elements include:
Under Basel-style regulations, Tier 1 quality is tightly defined. Deductions (such as goodwill, certain deferred tax assets, and investments in other financial institutions) can significantly reduce the headline accounting equity number. For this calculator, you should enter regulatory Tier 1 as defined by your jurisdiction, after all relevant adjustments.
Tier 2 capital provides additional loss absorption in the event of a bank resolution or wind-down. It usually includes:
Tier 2 is considered lower quality than Tier 1 because it may have fixed maturities, contractual interest payments, or lower loss-absorption capacity in stress events. Regulators often cap the amount of Tier 2 that can be counted relative to Tier 1. This calculator does not apply such caps; it simply uses the Tier 2 input you provide.
Not all assets are equally risky. A cash balance held at a central bank is far safer than an unsecured corporate loan. Risk-weighted assets (RWA) reflect this by applying a risk weight to each exposure category. For example, a simplified view might look like:
In modern frameworks, RWA can also include market risk (for trading books) and operational risk, derived from standardized formulas or internal models. This calculator assumes that you have already:
To use the CAR calculator effectively:
The result can be compared to internal targets, regulatory minimums, or peer banks’ ratios.
CAR is typically expressed as a percentage, such as 10.5% or 15.2%. Very broadly, and without claiming any universal standard:
Under Basel-style frameworks, many jurisdictions require at least an 8% total capital ratio, with additional buffers such as:
Because each jurisdiction can adopt different thresholds, supervisory expectations, and transitional rules, you should always compare your result to the specific minimums and target ranges that apply in your country or region.
Suppose a regional bank reports:
Using the formula:
CAR = (8 + 2) ÷ 80 × 100% = 10 ÷ 80 × 100% = 12.5%
If the binding regulatory minimum including buffers is, for example, 10.5%, the bank still has some headroom above the requirement.
Now assume that credit quality deteriorates or the portfolio shifts towards riskier assets, increasing risk weights so that RWA rises to 100 billion, while capital remains unchanged:
The new CAR is:
CAR = (8 + 2) ÷ 100 × 100% = 10 ÷ 100 × 100% = 10%
Even though the nominal capital base has not changed, the ratio falls because the bank is now taking more risk per unit of capital. This illustrates how CAR is sensitive to both the volume and the riskiness of exposures.
Consider a bank that strengthens its capital position through a new equity issue, while its RWA stays at 80 billion:
The CAR becomes:
CAR = (9 + 2) ÷ 80 × 100% = 11 ÷ 80 × 100% = 13.75%
In this scenario, capital has increased relative to risk, improving the bank’s resilience and providing greater margin over regulatory minimums.
The total capital adequacy ratio is closely related to other regulatory metrics. The table below summarizes some common ratios and how they compare conceptually.
| Ratio | Formula (high level) | Focus | Typical use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) | (Tier 1 + Tier 2) ÷ Risk-weighted assets | Overall loss-absorbing capital vs risk | Key regulatory measure for solvency and buffers |
| CET1 Ratio | CET1 capital ÷ Risk-weighted assets | Highest quality common equity capital | Primary focus of many Basel III requirements |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | Tier 1 capital ÷ Risk-weighted assets | Going-concern loss-absorbing capacity | Assesses core capital strength excluding Tier 2 |
| Leverage Ratio | Tier 1 capital ÷ Total (non risk-weighted) exposures | Overall leverage, independent of risk weights | Backstop to prevent excessive balance sheet leverage |
While this calculator focuses on the total capital adequacy ratio, interpreting results in combination with CET1, Tier 1, and leverage ratios can give a more complete view of a bank’s capital position.
This calculator is intentionally simple and makes several important assumptions. Understanding these limitations is essential before using the output in any decision-making context.
Global standards such as the Basel framework are implemented differently across countries and regions. Supervisors may:
As a result, two banks with the same CAR calculated here might face different supervisory assessments. Always refer to official regulations, supervisory guidance, and internal risk policies when interpreting your results.
This calculator is provided for educational and illustrative purposes. It is not a substitute for professional advice, regulatory reporting systems, or internal risk models. You should not rely on the output as the sole basis for any regulatory filings, investment decisions, or risk management actions. When in doubt, consult your regulator, auditors, or qualified risk professionals.
Used thoughtfully and with awareness of its limitations, the capital adequacy ratio remains a central indicator of banking resilience and a cornerstone of prudential regulation worldwide.