This calculator estimates how far a cellular tower can "see" a mobile device over the Earth’s curvature, and then converts that into an idealized coverage area. It models line-of-sight (LOS) range using a simple radio-horizon formula, based only on the height of the tower and the height of the receiving device above ground.
In real cellular networks, many additional factors influence coverage, such as terrain, buildings, frequency, and transmit power. The goal here is not to predict exact service bars on your phone, but to provide a first-order geometric estimate that helps you understand how antenna height affects potential range.
The calculator takes two main inputs, both in meters (m):
By changing either value, you can see how raising the tower or the device affects the theoretical maximum distance where a direct radio line-of-sight still exists.
The calculator uses standard approximations for the radio horizon on a spherical Earth. A popular engineering rule-of-thumb gives the horizon distance from a single antenna of height h (in meters) as:
d (km) ≈ 3.57 × √h
When both a transmitting antenna (tower) and a receiving antenna (device) are elevated above the ground, their line-of-sight ranges add together. The combined maximum distance is:
dtotal (km) ≈ 3.57 × (√h1 + √h2)
In more formal mathematical notation, the same relationship can be written as:
Here:
Once the distance d is known, the calculator estimates the idealized coverage area A as the area of a circle with radius d:
A (km²) = π × d²
In MathML form:
This treats the tower as if it could radiate equally in all directions out to the radio horizon, which is a simplification but useful for quick comparisons between different tower heights.
When you enter tower and device heights and click the calculate button, the tool reports at least two key outputs:
If the range is small (for example, under 10 km), it typically corresponds to short cells, common in dense urban deployments or low towers. Larger ranges (20–40 km) are more in line with high rural towers or special high-power installations.
It is important to remember that the actual usable coverage radius is often smaller than the LOS value. In practice, operators intentionally limit cell radius for capacity, handover performance, and quality-of-service reasons, even when the radio horizon would allow a longer path.
Consider a tower with an antenna height of 50 m and a mobile device held at 1.5 m above the ground. Using the combined radio-horizon formula, we can estimate the maximum LOS distance.
So a 50 m tower with a handheld device at 1.5 m has an approximate LOS range of about 30 km and an idealized coverage area of roughly 2700–2800 km². In reality, the usable coverage area will usually be much smaller once real-world propagation effects are included.
The table below shows how changing tower height affects the LOS distance, assuming a typical device height of 1.5 m. These values use the same formula as the calculator and are rounded for clarity.
| Tower height h₁ (m) | Device height h₂ (m) | LOS range d (km) | Idealized area A (km²) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 1.5 | ~22 | ~1,500 |
| 50 | 1.5 | ~30 | ~2,800 |
| 80 | 1.5 | ~36 | ~4,100 |
Notice that when tower height increases, range increases only with the square root of height, but the idealized area grows with the square of the distance. This means even moderate increases in tower height can significantly increase the potential footprint, which is why taller towers are often used in sparsely populated regions where wide coverage is more important than dense capacity.
The simplicity of the radio-horizon approach makes it useful for quick estimates, but it also introduces important limitations. The results from this calculator should be interpreted as best-case, geometric upper bounds, not guaranteed coverage distances.
For professional network design, engineers typically use more advanced propagation models (such as Okumura-Hata, COST-231, or 3GPP models) combined with geographic information systems (GIS) data. The calculator here is best viewed as an educational and preliminary sizing aid, or as a quick way to sanity-check the impact of changing antenna heights.
Despite its simplifications, a quick range estimate can be helpful in several contexts:
When using the tool in any planning workflow, treat the outputs as approximate upper bounds and apply safety margins if coverage reliability is important.
Beyond simple geometry, range depends on the frequency band (lower bands usually travel farther), transmit power, receiver sensitivity, antenna gains and patterns, terrain profile, clutter (buildings, vegetation), and the level of interference and noise in the network. The calculator focuses only on the geometric component — how far antennas can theoretically see each other over the horizon.
From the formula, range scales with the square root of height, so doubling tower height does not double range. Network operators also restrict cell radius for reasons like capacity and latency. Past a certain point, making towers taller may provide diminishing returns compared to deploying additional sites or small cells.
RF coverage maps (for example, from operators or planning tools) incorporate propagation models, terrain and building data, antenna patterns, and network load assumptions. They aim to predict signal strength or service quality at each location. This calculator instead provides a simplified, analytic estimate based solely on antenna heights and Earth curvature.
Not reliably. While the range estimate can indicate whether your location is within the tower’s theoretical LOS, real service availability depends on many additional engineering factors. For a specific address, consult your operator’s coverage maps or perform on-site measurements.