When the temperature drops, many people plug in a portable space heater to warm an entire room. Others reach for an electric blanket that directly warms the body. Both approaches offer comfort but consume electricity differently and have distinct lifespans.
This calculator quantifies the usage point where the personal warmth of a blanket becomes more economical than heating air with a fan-driven heater. It combines purchase price, expected lifespan, and energy usage into a single model. The output shows how many hours of use per season are needed before an electric blanket becomes cheaper to own and operate than a space heater.
Space heaters typically draw around 1,000–1,500 watts and can heat a small room quickly, yet they waste energy when the goal is simply to keep one person cozy. Electric blankets use a fraction of that power, often around 50–150 watts, but they have their own purchase cost and eventually wear out. Few people calculate whether frequent heater usage justifies buying a blanket instead; this tool helps you make that comparison objectively.
The calculator compares the per-season cost of using an electric blanket versus a space heater. Each device’s seasonal cost has two parts:
Definitions used in the formulas:
The per-season cost for each device is:
Written mathematically:
The break-even point is where these seasonal costs are equal.
To find the number of hours per season where both options cost the same, set the costs equal and solve for t:
B / B_l + (B_w / 1000) × R × t = H / H_l + (H_w / 1000) × R × t
Rearranging terms gives the break-even hours per season:
t = (H / H_l − B / B_l) ÷ ( (H_w − B_w) / 1000 × R )
In simplified form:
t = (H / H_l − B / B_l) × 1000 ÷ ( (H_w − B_w) × R )
If the denominator is zero or negative (that is, the blanket uses the same or more power than the heater, or your rate is zero), there is no cost-saving break-even point based on energy savings alone. In that case, the calculator should indicate that the blanket cannot recoup its cost through lower electricity use.
Consider this example:
Annualized purchase cost per season:
Energy cost per hour:
The example break-even is roughly 46 hours per season: below that, the heater is cheaper overall; above that threshold, the blanket becomes the more economical choice despite its higher purchase cost.
The table below illustrates how total seasonal cost changes with different hours of use, using the example values above.
| Hours per season | Blanket total cost | Heater total cost |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | $12 + (20 × $0.015) = $12.30 | $5 + (20 × $0.225) = $9.50 |
| 40 | $12 + (40 × $0.015) = $12.60 | $5 + (40 × $0.225) = $14.00 |
| 80 | $12 + (80 × $0.015) = $13.20 | $5 + (80 × $0.225) = $23.00 |
| 160 | $12 + (160 × $0.015) = $14.40 | $5 + (160 × $0.225) = $41.00 |
At low usage (around 20 hours per season), the heater is cheaper overall because its lower purchase cost dominates. As hours increase, the heater’s much higher power draw makes its energy cost rise quickly. Beyond the break-even point, the blanket’s efficiency more than offsets its higher initial price, and it remains cheaper for heavier use.
The calculator returns a number of hours per season. You can interpret this as follows:
Remember that the result is an estimate intended to help compare options on a consistent basis, not a precise prediction of your future energy bill.
Cost is only one factor. Typical real-world scenarios include:
If you are unsure of the exact wattage for your devices, you can use typical ranges as a starting point:
For the most accurate results, check the device label or manual for its rated wattage and your utility bill for your current electricity rate.
This calculator uses a simplified model. Keep these assumptions and limitations in mind when you interpret the results:
Because of these simplifications, your actual costs may differ from the calculator’s estimates, but the tool is useful for understanding the general trade-off between low-power localized heating (blanket) and higher-power room heating (space heater).
To make the most of this calculator, try a few different scenarios: optimistic and conservative lifespans, higher and lower usage hours, and a range of electricity rates if your utility prices fluctuate. If the blanket looks cheaper across realistic scenarios and matches your comfort and safety needs, it is likely a good cost-saving choice. If results are mixed or close, you may prioritize other factors such as comfort, safety features, or the need to warm more than one person or room.