Express shipping makes it possible to move products across regions or continents in a matter of hours or days. To achieve that speed, carriers rely heavily on air freight, time‑critical truck routes, and tightly scheduled hubs. All of this consumes energy and produces greenhouse gas emissions, usually expressed as kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (kg CO₂e).
This calculator estimates how much CO₂e is associated with transporting a package using different shipping modes (for example, standard ground trucking versus air express). By entering the package weight, shipping distance, and chosen mode, you can see how much extra climate impact you incur when you choose speed over slower, more efficient transport.
The goal is to make trade‑offs visible, not to tell you to stop ordering online. In many cases, you can substantially cut emissions simply by choosing a slower option when delivery urgency is low or by consolidating orders rather than shipping multiple small parcels separately.
The calculator uses a standard freight metric called the tonne‑kilometre. One tonne‑kilometre represents moving one metric tonne (1,000 kg) of goods over one kilometre. Emission factors express how many kilograms of CO₂e are emitted per tonne‑kilometre of freight for a given transport mode.
The core idea is simple: heavier packages and longer distances create larger emissions, and air transport is usually much more carbon‑intensive than ground trucking.
If you enter package weight W (in kilograms), distance D (in kilometres), and choose a shipping mode with emission factor f (in kg CO₂e per tonne‑km), the calculator estimates emissions E as:
In plain language: the calculator converts your package weight from kilograms to tonnes, multiplies by the shipping distance, and then multiplies by an average emission factor for the chosen mode.
The tool relies on representative average emission factors for typical freight operations. Actual values vary by vehicle type, routing, load factor, and fuel, but the broad differences between modes are consistent.
| Shipping mode | Emission factor (kg CO₂e/tonne‑km) | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| Ground (truck) | 0.1 | Standard road freight over regional or national distances |
| Air express | 0.6 | Time‑critical express parcels moved primarily by air |
In this simplified model, moving freight by air express produces roughly six times more CO₂e per tonne‑kilometre than moving the same freight by truck. Over long distances or with heavier packages, this multiplier leads to a large difference in total emissions.
You can run the calculator multiple times with different modes or distances to see how the carbon footprint changes when you adjust shipping speed or consolidate shipments.
The main output is expressed in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (kg CO₂e). This unit groups the warming impact of different greenhouse gases (such as CO₂, methane, and nitrous oxide) into a single, comparable number based on their global warming potential.
On its own, a number like “4.2 kg CO₂e” may not feel intuitive. Here are some approximate comparisons that can help place it in context:
Because the calculator lets you compare modes, the relative difference is often more useful than the absolute value. For example, if air express for a given package and distance emits 12 kg CO₂e while standard ground emits 2 kg CO₂e, selecting the slower mode would reduce your shipping‑related emissions by around 80–85% for that order.
Consider a 3 kg parcel shipped over 1,000 km. You want to compare ground versus air express.
Convert weight to tonnes: 3 ÷ 1000 = 0.003 tonnes.
Apply the formula:
So:
0.003 × 1000 = 3 tonne‑km; 3 × 0.1 = 0.3 kg CO₂e.
The estimated emissions for this shipment by ground are 0.3 kg CO₂e.
Weight in tonnes is the same: 0.003 tonnes.
Apply the formula again:
0.003 × 1000 = 3 tonne‑km; 3 × 0.6 = 1.8 kg CO₂e.
The estimated emissions for this shipment by air express are 1.8 kg CO₂e.
| Mode | Emission factor (kg CO₂e/tonne‑km) | Estimated emissions (kg CO₂e) | Relative to ground |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ground (truck) | 0.1 | 0.3 | Baseline |
| Air express | 0.6 | 1.8 | 6× higher |
Even for a small 3 kg parcel, choosing air express increases the shipping‑related emissions by a factor of six over the same distance. For heavier items or intercontinental routes, the gap grows even larger.
Although express shipping is usually more carbon‑intensive, there are situations where it may be reasonable or even necessary:
The calculator helps highlight the additional emissions so you can reserve express options for cases where speed truly matters, and choose slower modes when you have flexibility.
This tool is designed as an educational approximation rather than a carrier‑grade accounting system. Understanding its scope and limitations will help you use the results appropriately.
Because of these simplifications, you should treat the outputs as indicative ranges rather than exact numbers. Carrier‑specific carbon reports or detailed life‑cycle assessments may produce different values based on proprietary data and more granular modelling.
The emission factors used here are drawn from syntheses of publicly available freight and logistics research, including guidance from international transport and climate agencies. Studies of long‑haul trucking typically report values in the range of 0.07–0.15 kg CO₂e per tonne‑km, depending on the region and vehicle efficiency. Air cargo estimates for dedicated freight and express services often range from roughly 0.5 to 0.8 kg CO₂e per tonne‑km, with higher values for short‑haul flights and lower values for long‑haul routes.
The calculator chooses representative mid‑range values within these bands to highlight the relative gap between ground and air shipping. As datasets are updated and logistics practices evolve (for example, through increased use of sustainable aviation fuel or electric trucks), emission factors may change over time.
Using this calculator alongside other household or business carbon tools can help you see how shipping fits into your overall climate impact and where behaviour changes may be most effective.