Froude Number Calculator

Understanding the Froude Number

The Froude number, named after nineteenth-century engineer William Froude, is one of the fundamental dimensionless groups in fluid mechanics. It compares the characteristic inertial forces of a flow to the gravitational forces and is defined as the ratio of flow velocity to a characteristic wave propagation speed. In open-channel hydraulics and ship hydrodynamics, the Froude number gauges whether gravity waves generated by an object can travel upstream or are swept downstream. This simple ratio carries profound implications for the nature of a flow, the design of water conveyance structures, and the efficiency of marine vessels.

William Froude introduced the parameter in the 1860s while studying scale models of ships. His insight was that dynamic similarity between model tests and full-scale vessels requires matching the Froude number rather than the Reynolds number alone. By equating the ratio of inertial to gravitational forces, he ensured that wave patterns around a model faithfully reproduced those around the actual ship. Today his approach still underpins modern towing-tank experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations for seafaring craft ranging from cargo ships to racing yachts.

The Froude number for a flow with velocity $v$, characteristic length $L$, and gravitational acceleration $g$ is:

When $\mathrm{Fr}<1$, gravitational forces dominate and surface disturbances can travel both upstream and downstream, leading to subcritical or tranquil flow. If $\mathrm{Fr}=1$, the flow reaches a critical state where the velocity matches the wave celerity; small changes can cause abrupt transitions. For $\mathrm{Fr}>1$, inertial forces prevail and waves cannot propagate upstream, creating supercritical or rapid flow. Hydraulic structures such as spillways often exploit transitions between these regimes to dissipate energy through hydraulic jumps.

In open channels like rivers and canals, the characteristic length is typically the flow depth. Subcritical channels have deep, slow water where signals and waves can move upstream; supercritical channels are shallow and fast, with disturbances swept downstream. This distinction determines how flood waves propagate, how sediment is transported, and where structures must be placed to control the flow. Engineers designing culverts or flumes evaluate Froude number to ensure stable, non-erosive conditions and to predict the formation of standing waves or jumps that might endanger infrastructure.

Naval architects apply the Froude number with the hull waterline length as the characteristic dimension. At $\mathrm{Fr}\approx 0.4$, a displacement hull approaches its so-called “hull speed,” where the wavelength of generated waves equals the boat length. Pushing beyond this point demands disproportionate power because the vessel begins to climb its own bow wave. Planing hulls, high-speed ferries, and racing sailboats are designed to operate at higher Froude numbers, reducing wave drag by riding on top of the water rather than plowing through it. Scaling laws based on Froude similarity enable small model tests to forecast full-size performance, guiding propeller selection, power requirements, and fuel efficiency.

Beyond water conveyance and ship design, the Froude number appears in avalanche dynamics, granular flows, and even biomechanics. Skiers, for example, experience different stability regimes depending on their Froude number relative to the slope length. In meteorology, atmospheric flows over mountains can be categorized by Froude number to predict whether air will rise over the terrain or be deflected around it. This diversity underscores the ratio’s broad relevance wherever gravity plays a pivotal role.

Interpretation of Froude number benefits from comparison with other dimensionless groups. While the Reynolds number measures the relative importance of inertial to viscous forces and thus indicates whether a flow is laminar or turbulent, the Froude number emphasizes gravity’s influence. Two flows with vastly different Reynolds numbers may share the same Froude number and therefore exhibit similar wave behaviors. When surface tension becomes important, the Weber number joins the analysis. Engineers often consider all three numbers to capture the full picture of flow phenomena in free-surface problems.

Laboratory flumes and physical hydraulic models rely on Froude similitude for accurate scaling. To model a river segment in miniature, experimenters keep the Froude number equal between the model and prototype, which requires adjusting velocities and discharge rates according to the square root of the length scale. This approach preserves gravity waves and surface profiles. However, achieving full dynamic similarity also demands matching the Reynolds number, which is usually impractical at small scales. Thus, models prioritized for Froude similarity often sacrifice exact Reynolds equivalence, introducing some viscosity-related distortion that must be interpreted carefully.

The equation’s simplicity belies nuanced assumptions. It treats the characteristic wave speed as $\sqrt{gL}$, valid for shallow-water gravity waves. In deep water, wave speed instead depends on wavelength, and other formulas emerge. Furthermore, when flows contain multiple length scales—such as a river with varying depth and width—choosing $L$ becomes subjective. Despite these limitations, the Froude number remains a remarkably effective tool for first-order analysis and design.

The table below illustrates sample Froude numbers for several scenarios. Each entry uses typical velocities and depths or characteristic lengths drawn from real-world situations.

Logging flow scenarios is a powerful learning tool. After you compute a Froude number, use the Copy Result button to store the value and regime in project notes. Comparing multiple logs helps engineers and students track how depth or speed changes shift a system from subcritical to supercritical flow.