Kibble–Zurek Defect Density Calculator

JJ Ben-Joseph headshot JJ Ben-Joseph

Enter parameters to evaluate freeze-out scales.

Understanding the Kibble–Zurek Mechanism

The Kibble–Zurek mechanism (KZM) provides a universal framework for predicting the formation of topological defects when a system is driven through a continuous phase transition at a finite rate. Originally proposed by Tom Kibble in the context of cosmological symmetry breaking in the early universe and later adapted by Wojciech Zurek for condensed matter systems, the mechanism connects nonequilibrium dynamics with critical exponents. As a system approaches a second-order critical point, its relaxation time diverges—a phenomenon known as critical slowing down. Consequently, even an arbitrarily slow quench cannot maintain adiabaticity close to the transition. Instead, there exists a characteristic time, the freeze-out time \(\hat{t}\), at which the system falls out of equilibrium. Domains of the ordered phase nucleate independently, separated by defects whose density is governed by the correlation length at \(\hat{t}\), denoted \(\hat{\xi}\). The resulting defect density \(n_{\text{def}}\) typically scales as \(\hat{\xi}^{-d}\) in d spatial dimensions. The power of the KZM lies in expressing \(\hat{t}\) and \(\hat{\xi}\) in terms of critical exponents and the quench rate, yielding universal predictions independent of microscopic details.

To derive these scaling relations, consider a system characterized by an equilibrium correlation length \(\xi \sim |\epsilon|^{-\nu}\) and relaxation time \(\tau \sim \xi^{z} \sim |\epsilon|^{-\nu z}\), where \(\epsilon = (T - T_c)/T_c\) measures the distance to the critical temperature and \(\nu\), \(z\) are the correlation length and dynamical critical exponents, respectively. During a linear quench where \(\epsilon(t) = t/\tau_Q\), adiabatic evolution breaks down when the relaxation time equals the remaining time to the transition: \(\tau(\hat{t}) \approx |\hat{t}|\). Solving this implicit equation gives the freeze-out time \(\hat{t} \sim \tau_0^{\frac{1}{1+\nu z}} \tau_Q^{\frac{\nu z}{1+\nu z}}\), where \(\tau_0\) is a microscopic timescale. The corresponding correlation length is \(\hat{\xi} \sim \xi_0 (\tau_Q/\tau_0)^{\frac{\nu}{1+\nu z}}\). These expressions reveal how slower quenches (large \(\tau_Q\)) produce fewer defects by allowing larger correlated regions to form before freeze-out, while faster quenches yield high defect densities.

This calculator implements these relations for arbitrary critical exponents and spatial dimension. Users input \(\nu\), \(z\), \(\tau_0\), \(\tau_Q\), and \(d\); the script computes \(\hat{t}\), \(\hat{\xi}\), and the estimated defect density \(n_{\text{def}} = \hat{\xi}^{-d}\). It assumes a linear quench and neglects numerical prefactors of order unity, focusing on scaling behavior. Nevertheless, the predictions often match experiments within a reasonable margin. For instance, in superfluid helium quenched through the lambda transition, the density of vortices depends on the quench rate in agreement with KZM scaling. Similar tests have been performed in liquid crystals, Bose–Einstein condensates, ferroelectrics, and even trapped-ion simulations of quantum phase transitions, establishing the mechanism as a cornerstone of nonequilibrium critical dynamics.

The KZM has implications far beyond condensed matter. In the early universe, rapid cooling following cosmic inflation could trigger symmetry-breaking transitions in grand unified theories, spawning cosmic strings, monopoles, or domain walls. The density of such relics would depend on the expansion rate of the universe and the relevant critical exponents. While no definitive evidence of these defects has been observed, the KZM guides predictions for their possible abundance and thus informs searches in astrophysical data. In addition, the mechanism highlights an intriguing connection between cosmology and laboratory physics: tabletop experiments replicating KZM scaling provide analogues of processes that occurred microseconds after the Big Bang.

Recent research extends the KZM to quantum phase transitions where the control parameter is not temperature but another tuning field such as magnetic field or interaction strength. In this quantum regime, the relevant exponents describe how energy gaps and correlation lengths close at zero temperature. Experiments with ultracold atoms and superconducting qubits have observed defect production consistent with quantum Kibble–Zurek predictions, showcasing the mechanism's broad applicability. Moreover, modifications such as inhomogeneous quenches, finite-size effects, and dissipation can be incorporated, leading to refined scaling laws that capture real-world complexities.

Mathematically, the expressions implemented in this calculator are

\hat{t}=\tau_011+\nuz \tau_Q\nu1+\nuz \hat{\xi}=\xi0 \tau_Q/\tau_0\nu1+\nuz

where \(\xi_0\) is a microscopic length scale set to unity for simplicity in this calculator. The defect density then follows as \(n_{\text{def}} = \hat{\xi}^{-d}\). Users interested in absolute defect counts can multiply this density by the system volume. The tool thus enables quick explorations of how varying critical exponents and quench rates influence nonequilibrium structure formation.

By adjusting parameters, one can model diverse scenarios. For example, suppose a two-dimensional system with \(\nu = 1\), \(z = 2\), \(\tau_0 = 10^{-9}\) s, and \(\tau_Q = 10^{-3}\) s is quenched through a transition. The calculator predicts \(\hat{t} \approx 10^{-6} \) s, \(\hat{\xi} \approx 10^{-3} \) m, and a defect density of \(10^{6} \) m−2. If the quench is slowed to \(\tau_Q = 10^{-1}\) s, \(\hat{\xi}\) grows to \(10^{-2}\) m, reducing the defect density by two orders of magnitude. Such scaling behavior is routinely observed in numerical simulations and experiments, validating the KZM across disparate platforms.

Beyond its predictive power, the KZM offers pedagogical insight into universality. It demonstrates how macroscopic phenomena—whether cosmic strings in the early universe or vortices in superfluid helium—can arise from the same underlying principles. The mechanism underscores that critical exponents, determined by symmetry and dimensionality, govern dynamics regardless of microscopic details. By encapsulating these ideas in an accessible calculator, researchers and students can rapidly test hypotheses, plan experiments, or simply deepen their understanding of nonequilibrium phase transitions.

In conclusion, the Kibble–Zurek defect density calculator provides a practical implementation of universal scaling laws for defect formation. By inputting the relevant critical exponents and time scales, users obtain freeze-out times, correlation lengths, and defect densities that capture the essence of nonequilibrium critical dynamics. Whether applied to cosmology, condensed matter, or quantum simulations, the KZM continues to illuminate how the interplay of symmetry, scaling, and dynamics shapes the structure of the universe and the materials within it.

Related Calculators

Nuclear Binding Energy Calculator - Mass Defect and Stability

Estimate the binding energy of an atomic nucleus from its mass and composition. Learn how mass defect relates to stability and energy release.

nuclear binding energy calculator mass defect nuclear stability

Kosterlitz–Thouless Transition Temperature Calculator

Estimate the Kosterlitz–Thouless transition temperature from areal superfluid density and particle mass.

Kosterlitz–Thouless transition calculator 2D superfluid XY model vortex unbinding

Landau–Zener Transition Probability Calculator

Compute adiabatic and diabatic transition probabilities for a two-level system crossing using the Landau–Zener formula.

landau zener transition calculator avoided crossing quantum two level system