Lean body mass (LBM) is an estimate of everything in your body that is not fat. It includes muscle, organs, bones, connective tissue, body water, and other fat‑free components. In simple terms:
Total body weight = lean body mass + fat mass
Because LBM focuses on the fat‑free part of your weight, it is often used to guide training programs, track body‑composition changes, and, in some clinical settings, to help estimate medication doses or nutritional needs.
This calculator shows lean body mass estimates from three commonly cited equations: Boer, James, and Hume. Each formula was developed from different study populations and assumptions. For some people the formulas give very similar results; for others they can differ by several kilograms.
Seeing all three side by side helps you:
The calculator expects weight in kilograms (kg) and height in centimetres (cm). Below are simplified versions of the formulas for adults. Exact coefficients may vary slightly between references.
The Boer formulas were developed for adults and are frequently used in clinical contexts such as drug dosing. They tend to produce moderate LBM estimates across a wide range of body sizes.
In generic form, the Boer equation for lean body mass can be written as:
where W is weight in kg, H is height in cm, and a, b, and c are constants that differ for males and females in the original publications.
Applicability: adults; commonly used for both normal‑weight and higher‑BMI individuals, but still based on population averages.
The James formulas are among the earlier LBM equations and are sometimes used in pharmacology and physiology. They were developed from adult subjects with relatively typical body sizes for the time.
They also follow the general pattern of combining weight and height terms to approximate fat‑free mass.
Applicability: adults; may be less accurate for people with very high obesity or very high muscularity compared with more recent formulas.
The Hume equations were derived from body‑composition studies using techniques such as isotope dilution to estimate total body water (which closely tracks lean mass). They are often used in research and clinical practice.
Like the other formulas, Hume uses linear combinations of weight and height and different constants for males and females.
Applicability: adults; widely used, but still an estimate rather than a direct measurement.
To see how the formulas compare, imagine an adult who is 75 kg and 175 cm tall.
You might see numbers in roughly this range (illustrative only):
Even without exact coefficients shown here, the key point is that all three estimates cluster within a few kilograms. That spread is a reasonable picture of the uncertainty around your true lean mass when using formula‑based methods.
Your lean body mass result is best interpreted together with other measures such as total weight, body‑fat percentage (if you have it), waist circumference, fitness level, and health history.
In general:
Because each equation uses slightly different assumptions, do not treat small differences between formulas as meaningful on their own. Instead, look at the overall range they provide.
| Formula | Inputs | Typical use | General tendencies | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boer | Weight (kg), height (cm), sex | Clinical dosing, body‑composition estimation in adults | Often produces mid‑range LBM values for many body types | Common practical choice when a single estimate is needed |
| James | Weight (kg), height (cm), sex | Older pharmacology and physiology references | May estimate slightly different LBM at high or low body weights | Less tailored to modern patterns of obesity and muscularity |
| Hume | Weight (kg), height (cm), sex | Research, clinical estimation linked to total body water | Generally close to Boer for many adults, but can differ by a few kg | Grounded in studies using body‑water measurements |
If you are unsure which number to use, a simple strategy is to focus on one main formula (for example, Boer or Hume) and keep the others in mind as a sensitivity check.
The calculator performs all computations in your browser; your entries are not sent to a server as part of the calculation itself.
All three equations are based on statistical relationships observed in specific adult populations. That means they share important limitations:
For precise assessment of body composition, methods such as DEXA scans, bioimpedance analysis in a clinical setting, or other imaging and laboratory techniques are required.
The lean body mass values from this calculator are estimates for educational and general‑information purposes only. They are not a diagnosis, do not replace professional medical advice, and should not be used on their own to make decisions about medications, medical treatments, or major lifestyle changes.
If you have health concerns, are managing a medical condition, or need body‑composition data for clinical decisions, consult a qualified healthcare professional who can evaluate you using appropriate methods and your full medical history.
Lean body mass (LBM) represents the total weight of your body minus all fat mass. It encompasses muscle, bone, water, connective tissue, organs, and everything else that is not adipose tissue. Monitoring changes in LBM over time provides a more nuanced picture of health than body weight alone because it distinguishes metabolically active tissues from stored fat. Athletes often aim to maximize LBM to improve strength and performance, whereas clinicians monitor it to assess nutritional status, sarcopenia, or the metabolic impact of diseases. Accurate estimation of LBM requires sophisticated imaging techniques such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or magnetic resonance imaging, but these methods are expensive and not always accessible. As a result, several anthropometric equations have been developed to estimate LBM using readily available measurements of weight and height. This calculator implements three widely cited approaches: the Boer, James, and Hume formulas.
The Boer equation, derived from body composition studies in the 1980s, is often considered reliable for use in drug dosing where lean mass affects pharmacokinetics. For men, it is expressed as:
For women, the coefficients shift to reflect average physiological differences:
Here represents body weight in kilograms and denotes height in centimeters. The result is given in kilograms of lean mass. These coefficients were derived from population data and are therefore estimations rather than personalized measurements.
The James formula predates Boer and employs a nonlinear term to account for the tendency of lean mass to scale differently in larger bodies. The equation for men is:
For women, the coefficients differ slightly:
The squared weight-to-height ratio effectively scales down the result for individuals with a higher body mass relative to their stature, acknowledging that lean tissue does not accumulate infinitely with increasing body size. While the James equation has historical significance, some researchers argue that it may underestimate LBM in obese individuals because it was developed using data from leaner populations.
The Hume formula was introduced to provide a simpler linear alternative based on height and weight. For men:
For women:
Each formula makes specific assumptions about body geometry and hydration. They are best viewed as tools that offer ranges rather than absolute truths. Comparing the outputs from multiple equations, as provided by this calculator, gives a sense of variability and encourages critical interpretation. In practice, clinicians may choose one formula over another based on the patient population or the clinical application, such as dosing of certain medications that distribute primarily in lean tissues.
After computing the three values, many users wonder which one is "correct." The reality is that all anthropometric equations have error margins, typically ranging from 1 to 5 kilograms depending on the individual and the dataset used to develop the equation. Rather than viewing discrepancies as flaws, consider them as confidence intervals. When all three formulas converge on a similar number, there is greater assurance that the estimate is close to the true lean mass. When they diverge, factors such as unusually high muscle development or obesity may be influencing the calculation. Advanced athletes may find that formulas underpredict LBM because they possess more muscle than the average person on which the equations were based. Conversely, individuals with a higher fat proportion may see overpredictions.
Using your estimated lean mass, you can derive additional metrics. The Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI) divides LBM by height squared, providing a standardized measure of muscularity. Calculating FFMI helps compare physiques of different heights on a level playing field. Similarly, the percentage of lean mass relative to total body weight indicates body composition. For example, if your LBM is 60 kilograms and you weigh 80 kilograms, your lean mass percentage is 75%. Tracking this value over time can highlight whether weight changes stem from gains in muscle or fat. This is particularly useful during bulking or cutting phases in fitness programs, or when monitoring the effectiveness of nutritional interventions in clinical settings.
Keep in mind that hydration status can affect scale weight and thus lean mass estimates. Dehydration reduces total body water, lowering scale weight and causing an apparent drop in LBM even though muscle tissue has not changed. To minimize variability, take measurements under consistent conditions—ideally in the morning after using the restroom and before eating or exercising. Individuals engaged in resistance training may also experience acute muscle swelling after workouts that slightly increases LBM readings. These variations typically normalize within 24 to 48 hours.
Understanding lean body mass also supports more informed goal-setting. Suppose a person aims to achieve a certain body fat percentage. Knowing their LBM allows them to project the target weight required to reach that percentage. If LBM is 55 kilograms and the desired body fat is 15%, the target weight can be found by dividing LBM by one minus the desired fat fraction. In MathML this appears as:
where is the desired body fat expressed as a decimal. Plugging 0.15 yields a target weight of approximately 64.7 kilograms. Such calculations demonstrate how lean mass estimates inform practical decisions about diet and training.
Below is a table summarizing the core formulas used in this calculator, providing a quick reference once you are familiar with the variables:
| Formula | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|
| Boer | 0.407W + 0.267H - 19.2 | 0.252W + 0.473H - 48.3 |
| James | 1.1W - 128(W²/H²) | 1.07W - 148(W²/H²) |
| Hume | 0.32810W + 0.33929H - 29.5336 | 0.29569W + 0.41813H - 43.2933 |
As with any health-related metric, lean body mass should be interpreted alongside other indicators such as strength levels, endurance, blood markers, and subjective well-being. A singular focus on maximizing LBM may overlook important aspects of overall fitness like flexibility or cardiovascular health. Moreover, cultural and personal factors influence what is considered an "ideal" body composition. Rather than striving for an arbitrary number, use LBM as one piece of feedback that helps tailor training programs, nutritional strategies, and medical treatments to your individual needs.
The more we understand our bodies, the better we can support them. Whether you're embarking on a fitness journey, managing a medical condition, or simply curious about your composition, this calculator offers a transparent starting point. Compare the outputs, reflect on how they align with your goals, and consult healthcare professionals for personalized advice. Over time, tracking lean mass alongside strength metrics and lifestyle habits can reveal patterns that guide smarter adjustments. Embrace the process of experimentation and learning; your body is a dynamic system that responds to consistent care and informed choices.