The QT interval represents the time between the start of ventricular depolarization and the completion of repolarization on an electrocardiogram (ECG). Measured in milliseconds, it extends from the beginning of the Q wave to the end of the T wave. When the QT interval is prolonged, the heart is more susceptible to dangerous arrhythmias such as torsades de pointes. Medications, electrolyte disturbances, or congenital conditions may lengthen this interval, so clinicians monitor it closely.
Because the QT interval varies with heart rate, a shorter interval occurs naturally at higher heart rates. To compare values across different heart rates, medical professionals use formulas that adjust or "correct" the QT interval. The resulting value, called QTc, approximates what the QT would be at a heart rate of 60 beats per minute. QTc lets doctors assess risk more consistently across patients. A normal QTc typically falls below 450 ms for men and 460 ms for women, though thresholds vary by guideline.
The Bazett correction is the oldest and most commonly used method. It divides the QT interval by the square root of the preceding RR interval, expressed in seconds:
While simple, Bazett tends to overcorrect at high heart rates and undercorrect when the heart rate is slow. An alternative is the Fridericia formula, which divides the QT interval by the cube root of RR:
Both formulas aim to provide a more standardized measure of ventricular repolarization. Our calculator outputs QTc values using both approaches so you can compare them.
Start by measuring the QT and RR intervals on a recent ECG. The RR interval is the distance between two consecutive R waves and corresponds to one heartbeat. Enter the values above and click Calculate. The script computes Bazett and Fridericia QTc values in milliseconds. If the result exceeds 500 ms, you should contact a healthcare professional immediately, as this could signal an elevated risk of ventricular arrhythmias.
The following table summarizes common QTc reference ranges:
| QTc (ms) | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| < 450 | Generally Normal (men) |
| < 460 | Generally Normal (women) |
| 460-500 | Borderline / Monitor |
| > 500 | High Risk – Evaluate Immediately |
Remember, these ranges may differ slightly depending on your medical facility or region. The context of medications and overall health matters greatly. Some heart conditions can cause a prolonged QTc even without symptoms, while others experience dizziness or fainting with only modest prolongation.
Multiple variables influence the QTc interval. Certain antibiotics, antidepressants, and antiarrhythmic drugs are notorious for lengthening QTc. Electrolyte imbalances, particularly low potassium or magnesium, also contribute. Genetic syndromes like Long QT Syndrome result from mutations in ion channel genes and warrant lifelong monitoring. Additionally, hormonal changes, such as those occurring during pregnancy, can affect QTc values. Understanding these influences helps clinicians decide when to intervene or adjust treatment.
Because QTc aims to account for heart rate, rapid changes in rhythm can still challenge the accuracy of the correction. Heart rate variability—a measure of beat-to-beat fluctuations—can cause successive QT and RR intervals to vary widely. Some researchers advocate for dynamic corrections that incorporate multiple beats or use more complex formulas. Nonetheless, Bazett and Fridericia remain practical for quick assessments and are widely referenced in medical literature.
QTc monitoring is standard during many hospital stays, particularly when administering medications known to prolong the QT interval. Cardiology clinics evaluate QTc before and after starting certain drugs to identify risk early. In research settings, QTc is a key safety endpoint when testing new compounds. Even outside professional care, people with wearable ECG devices can track QTc trends to inform discussions with their doctors.
Imagine a patient with a measured QT interval of 440 ms and an RR interval of 800 ms. Converting RR to seconds gives 0.8. Using Bazett, QTc equals or roughly 491 ms. With Fridericia, QTc equals , about 470 ms. While the Bazett result edges toward the high-risk threshold, Fridericia indicates borderline prolongation. Such differences show why clinicians sometimes consult multiple formulas.
If your QTc is high, a healthcare provider may review your medication list for drugs that lengthen the QT interval. Adjusting dosages, switching medications, or correcting electrolyte imbalances can help. Lifestyle changes also support cardiac health—avoiding stimulant abuse, managing stress, and addressing sleep apnea may all play a role. For congenital conditions, specialists might recommend beta blockers or implantable defibrillators to prevent arrhythmic events.
No correction method is perfect. Bazett tends to misestimate at extremes of heart rate, and Fridericia may slightly undercorrect in certain circumstances. Sophisticated alternatives like the Framingham or Hodges formulas attempt to address these shortcomings, but they require more complex calculations. For quick bedside decisions, Bazett and Fridericia balance simplicity with reasonable accuracy. Always interpret results alongside clinical findings.
QTc is a powerful metric, but it does not tell the whole story. Symptoms such as palpitations, fainting, or seizures warrant attention even if QTc appears normal. Similarly, a single elevated measurement might not signal danger if subsequent readings are normal and the patient feels well. Discuss trends and symptoms with your healthcare provider to gain a comprehensive view of heart rhythm health.
This calculator offers a convenient way to estimate QTc using both Bazett and Fridericia formulas. By entering QT and RR intervals, you can gauge potential arrhythmia risk and discuss results with your medical team. Understanding how medications, electrolytes, and heart rate affect the QT interval empowers you to take proactive steps toward cardiovascular wellness. Whether you monitor QTc at home or rely on clinical evaluations, knowledge of these values is a vital part of modern heart care.
Estimate the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score from lab values to gauge transplant urgency.
Answer five SCOFF questions to evaluate possible symptoms of anorexia or bulimia and decide if you should seek professional advice.
Answer four yes or no questions to evaluate potential alcohol misuse using the CAGE screening tool.