Homes are electrifying at a rapid pace. Heat pumps, electric vehicle (EV) chargers, induction ranges, and battery systems all add significant load to legacy 100–150 amp service panels. Upgrading to a larger service (for example, moving from 100 A to 200 A) can trigger costly utility fees, trenching work, and meter replacements. A smart breaker panel offers an alternative: instead of increasing the size of the electrical “pipe,” it actively manages when and how loads operate so the existing service can safely support more equipment.
This planner helps you quantify that value. Using your estimates for peak demand, shiftable load, critical backup load, battery size, and tariffs, it calculates:
The goal is not to replace detailed engineering design, but to provide a high‑level planning tool for homeowners, installers, and energy consultants who are considering an intelligent panel instead of (or in addition to) a traditional service upgrade.
The form above asks for several technical and financial inputs. Here is how to think about each one when entering values:
The calculator uses simple engineering and financial relationships to estimate capacity relief, savings, and payback. The following formulas are representative of the logic.
First, the main service rating and voltage are converted into an approximate kilowatt capacity, assuming single‑phase service and a power factor close to 1:
where P is panel capacity in kW, I is the main service rating in amps, and V is the service voltage in volts.
Peak demand after adding a smart panel is modeled as your base peak minus the shiftable portion:
P_new = P_base − S
where P_base is current peak demand (kW) and S is the shiftable load (kW) that the panel can actively move out of the most constrained period.
The resulting headroom is then:
Headroom = P_service − P_new
where P_service is the calculated service capacity in kW. Positive headroom means there is spare capacity even during managed peaks; negative headroom indicates your service could still be constrained.
The planner assumes that the shiftable load is moved from peak to off‑peak periods, creating a savings on each kilowatt‑hour shifted:
Annual_Shifted_kWh = S × H × D
where S is shiftable power (kW), H is peak hours per day, and D is days per year on TOU rates.
The annual cost savings are then estimated as:
Savings = Annual_Shifted_kWh × (T_peak − T_off)
where T_peak and T_off are the peak and off‑peak tariffs in $/kWh.
Battery backup runtime for your critical loads is approximated as:
Baseline_Runtime (hours) = Battery_Capacity / Critical_Load
A smart panel can increase this runtime by shedding non‑critical circuits and enforcing the critical backup load you entered. In practice, the tool may treat a portion of your load as deferrable even during outages, increasing the effective runtime by a factor based on how aggressively you allow circuits to be shed.
The smart panel is treated as a capital investment with an installed cost, lifetime, and discount rate. The annualized cost is computed using a capital recovery factor (CRF):
CRF = r × (1 + r)^n / ((1 + r)^n − 1)
Annualized_Cost = Panel_Cost × CRF
where r is the discount rate (as a decimal), and n is the panel lifetime in years. Comparing Annualized_Cost to the annual TOU savings helps estimate simple payback and the attractiveness of the investment.
When you run the planner, you will typically see outputs that relate to:
Results are most compelling when:
Benefits are more modest if your service is already oversized, your tariff has little or no TOU differential, or you have very few flexible loads. In those cases, a smart panel may still offer convenience and monitoring benefits, but the pure financial payback can be slower.
Consider a home with the following characteristics (similar to the defaults in the form):
Step 1: Service capacity
P_service = (200 A × 240 V) / 1000 ≈ 48 kW
In practice, continuous limits and diversity mean you would rarely use all 48 kW, but this provides a reasonable upper‑bound reference.
Step 2: Peak relief
P_new = 17 kW − 6.5 kW = 10.5 kW
So, during managed periods, the smart panel aims to keep peak demand around 10.5 kW, freeing up substantial headroom vs. the service rating.
Step 3: Annual TOU savings
Annual_Shifted_kWh = 6.5 kW × 5 h/day × 300 days ≈ 9,750 kWh
Savings = 9,750 kWh × ($0.32 − $0.12) ≈ 9,750 × $0.20 ≈ $1,950/year
This assumes your shiftable loads consistently operate during peak windows and can be moved fully to off‑peak periods.
Step 4: Backup runtime
Baseline_Runtime = 13.5 kWh / 5 kW = 2.7 hours
If the smart panel can further trim non‑critical usage and enforce that 5 kW target, real‑world runtime may be a bit longer than an unmanaged home where other loads could accidentally turn on during the outage.
Step 5: Annualized panel cost
Using a discount rate of 5% and a 15‑year life:
CRF ≈ 0.096 (approximate value)
Annualized_Cost ≈ $4,500 × 0.096 ≈ $432/year
Comparing $1,950/year in modeled TOU savings to $432/year in annualized cost suggests a strong financial case in this scenario, with a simple payback of just a few years. Your own results will depend heavily on tariffs, shiftable load, and usage patterns.
The table below summarizes how different situations can affect the value of a smart breaker panel.
| Scenario | Service Constraint | TOU Spread | Shiftable Load | Battery Present? | Expected Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrifying home with EV and heat pump | High (near service limit) | High | High (EV, water heater) | Yes | Very strong case for smart panel to avoid upgrade and boost backup runtime. |
| Large existing service, modest loads | Low (plenty of headroom) | Low to medium | Moderate | No | Benefits mostly in visibility and future‑proofing; payback may be slower. |
| Frequent outages with battery storage | Medium | Medium | Moderate | Yes | Good value from extended backup runtime and prioritized circuits. |
| No TOU tariff, flat energy price | Medium | None | High | Optional | Value is mostly from avoiding service upgrades rather than bill savings. |
This planner uses simplified models to stay transparent and easy to use. Keep the following points in mind when interpreting results:
Because of these limitations, the outputs should be treated as directional estimates rather than precise design values.
This planner provides high‑level estimates only and is for informational purposes. It is not electrical engineering, financial, or investment advice. Always verify results with your utility tariffs, local building and electrical codes, and manufacturer specifications. Before changing service equipment, adding large loads, or relying on backup power, consult a licensed electrician or qualified designer.
| Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Available Headroom (kW) | 0 | Service rating minus current peak |
| Peak Demand After Shifting (kW) | 0 | Peak demand reduced by shiftable load |
| Tariff Savings per Year | 0 | Shifting load from peak to off-peak pricing |
| Battery Backup Runtime (hours) | 0 | Critical load served by battery plus shifting |
| Annualized Panel Cost | 0 | Capital recovery of smart panel hardware |
| Net Annual Benefit | 0 | Tariff savings minus annualized cost |
| Payback Period (years) | 0 | Installed cost divided by annual savings |