Rooftop solar panels and small residential wind turbines are two of the most accessible ways for homeowners to generate their own electricity. Each technology has different strengths, costs, and site requirements. This calculator focuses on a single, comparable metric: the estimated lifetime cost per kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity produced by each option. By expressing both solar and wind in the same units, you can see which system offers better long-term value for your property.
The tool is built around a simplified levelized cost of energy (LCOE) approach. It uses your assumptions for installation cost, annual energy production, yearly maintenance spending, and system lifespan. From those inputs, it estimates how many kWh each system will produce over its life and how much each kWh effectively costs you.
Use this calculator when you want a quick, transparent comparison rather than a full financial model. It does not attempt to predict exact cash flows, but it does highlight how sensitive your decision is to factors like realistic output, maintenance needs, and expected lifetime of the equipment.
For both solar and wind, the calculator applies the same basic cost formula. The idea is to spread the total money you spend on a system over all of the electricity it generates during its life.
For either technology:
Total lifetime cost = installation cost + (annual maintenance cost ร lifespan in years)
Total lifetime energy = annual output (kWh) ร lifespan in years
The estimated cost per kWh (a simplified LCOE) is then:
Where:
Because the lifespan y appears in both the numerator and denominator, you can think of the formula more simply as:
LCOE = (C / (E ร y)) + (M / E)
The calculator uses the full expression so you can clearly see how installation and maintenance contribute to your final cost per kWh.
Once you enter values for both solar and wind, the calculator returns two numbers: an estimated cost per kWh for the solar system and one for the wind system. You can interpret these as long-term "all-in" costs of producing your own electricity, based on the assumptions you entered.
Because the tool is linear and transparent, you can quickly run multiple scenarios to understand how changes in output, lifespan, or maintenance shift the comparison.
Consider a homeowner evaluating a solar array and a small home wind turbine:
In this example, the solar system has a lower estimated cost per kWh than the wind system. That makes solar more cost-effective, even though the solar installation costs more upfront. The key advantages here are higher annual output and a longer lifespan.
By adjusting the inputs, you may find scenarios where wind becomes more attractive, such as much higher wind output or lower maintenance costs in an excellent wind resource area.
The table below summarizes the example above and a couple of alternative scenarios to show how assumptions matter.
| Scenario | Solar cost per kWh | Wind cost per kWh | Which is cheaper? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base case (example above) | โ $0.13 | โ $0.20 | Solar |
| Higher wind output (6,000 kWh/year) | โ $0.13 | โ $0.13 | Roughly equal |
| Higher solar maintenance ($300/year) | โ $0.16 | โ $0.20 | Solar still cheaper |
| Lower solar output (4,000 kWh/year) | โ $0.19 | โ $0.20 | Very close |
These scenarios illustrate that:
To get the most insight from the calculator, treat it as an exploration tool rather than a single-answer quote.
Near the results, a simple rule of thumb applies: if both solar and wind cost per kWh are comfortably below your utility rate, self-generation is likely financially attractive under your assumptions. If they are above your utility rate, you may need incentives, better site conditions, or lower equipment prices to make the investment worthwhile.
This calculator is intentionally simplified. Understanding what it does not include is as important as understanding what it does.
The underlying method is based on the standard concept of levelized cost of energy (LCOE) commonly used in energy economics. Professional analyses add more detail, such as discount rates and degradation curves, but rely on the same basic idea: total lifetime cost divided by total lifetime energy.
Home wind systems are most competitive in locations with consistently strong, unobstructed wind and enough space for a properly sized and sited turbine. If your average wind speeds are high, maintenance can be managed cost-effectively, and solar production would be limited by shading or poor roof orientation, a wind system may achieve a lower cost per kWh than solar. In many typical suburban settings, however, wind speeds and siting constraints make rooftop or ground-mounted solar more cost-effective.
Many modern rooftop solar systems are designed for lifespans of 25โ30 years or more, with performance warranties often guaranteeing a large fraction of their original output at year 25. Small residential wind turbines commonly have shorter practical lifespans, often in the range of 15โ25 years, depending on design, site conditions, and maintenance. Actual lifetimes vary, so the lifespan you enter in the calculator should reflect manufacturer information and installer experience for your area.
For solar, annual maintenance is often low and may include occasional cleaning, inspection of wiring and mounting hardware, and inverter replacement or repair over the life of the system. Many homeowners see modest, irregular maintenance costs. For small wind turbines, maintenance is usually more involved and may include periodic inspections, lubrication, component replacement, tower inspections, and occasional major repairs after storms or mechanical wear. Your installer can provide a realistic estimate for your specific equipment and site.
Financial incentives reduce your effective cost per kWh by lowering what you ultimately pay for the system. This calculator does not model incentives directly, but you can approximate their impact by adjusting the installation cost. For example, if you expect a 30% tax credit on a $10,000 system, you could enter an installation cost of $7,000 instead. Keep in mind that some incentives are performance based or time limited, which this simple model does not capture.
No. This tool is designed for quick, side-by-side comparisons and educational exploration. It does not replace a site-specific design, performance modeling, or a detailed financial analysis prepared by qualified professionals. Once you have a sense of which technology looks more promising and under what assumptions, you should consult installers or energy professionals for precise sizing, pricing, and performance estimates for your property.