This page demonstrates how your browser can turn spoken words into written text using the Web Speech API. When supported, the browser exposes a SpeechRecognition interface (or a prefixed variant) that listens to your microphone, sends audio to an underlying recognition engine, and streams back text results. This tool provides simple controls on top of that interface so that you can try hands-free typing, dictation, and experimentation with different languages.
All recognition happens within your browser environment. The page itself does not upload raw audio to agentcalc.com. However, the browser or operating system may send audio to its own cloud speech service in order to decode it. This is similar to how commercial voice assistants and dictation tools work, but here the behavior is exposed through a minimal, developer-friendly interface.
The transcriber depends on the Web Speech API, which is not available in every browser. At the time of writing, support is strongest in Chromium-based browsers such as Google Chrome and some versions of Microsoft Edge. Many privacy-focused or mobile browsers either disable the feature or implement it differently.
For the tool to work reliably, the following conditions typically need to be met:
window.SpeechRecognition or window.webkitSpeechRecognition.localhost.When you click Start Listening for the first time, the browser usually shows a permission prompt asking whether to allow microphone access. If you deny the request, the recognition session will fail until you change the decision in your browser settings. If nothing appears when you click Start, you may be on an unsupported browser or have disabled microphone access globally.
en-US (English, United States), en-GB (English, United Kingdom), fr-FR (French, France), or es-ES (Spanish, Spain). The default is en-US.The language field accepts standard BCP 47 language tags. These tags combine a language code with optional region or script subtags, giving the recognizer useful hints about vocabulary, spelling, and pronunciation. Examples include:
en-US – English (United States)en-GB – English (United Kingdom)fr-FR – French (France)de-DE – German (Germany)es-ES – Spanish (Spain)pt-BR – Portuguese (Brazil)ja-JP – Japanese (Japan)Not every browser or backend supports all possible tags, but using a common combination of language and region improves accuracy. If you choose a language code that the engine does not understand, it may fall back to a default language or return very poor results.
Under the hood, setting the correct language affects both the acoustic and language models used for recognition. The acoustic model expects certain phonemes and typical sound patterns for the chosen language, while the language model favors word sequences that are common in that language and region.
Speech recognition is probabilistic. The engine assigns probabilities to many possible interpretations of your audio and returns the one it judges most likely. As a result, misrecognitions are inevitable, and you should always treat transcripts as drafts rather than final, authoritative records.
Researchers commonly measure accuracy using the word error rate (WER). WER compares the engine’s output to a human-created reference transcript by counting how many substitutions, deletions, and insertions are required to transform one into the other.
The formula for WER is:
where:
A lower WER corresponds to higher accuracy. High-quality commercial engines in favorable conditions often achieve single-digit WER for dictated speech, but real-world performance varies widely. Background noise, overlapping speakers, heavy accents, and technical vocabulary all tend to increase error rates.
Latency is another practical concern. The time between speaking a phrase and seeing it appear on screen depends on network round trips, server load (for cloud-based engines), and browser implementation details. This demo streams back interim results when available, so you may see text appear in bursts as the engine gains confidence.
The transcript produced by this tool is designed to be edited. In practice, a typical workflow might look like this:
Some recognition engines add basic punctuation automatically, such as commas and periods. Others require you to speak punctuation explicitly (for example, saying “comma” or “period”). This behavior is browser- and backend-specific, so you may need to experiment to learn how your setup behaves.
If you notice consistently wrong words, it can help to slow down slightly, enunciate clearly, and avoid talking over other people or background audio. For specialized jargon, you may need to correct the text manually after dictation, since most general-purpose models are not trained on narrow technical vocabularies.
Imagine you want to dictate a short email in English using a US keyboard and microphone. Here is a simple way to use this transcriber:
en-US selected.In a typical browser that supports the Web Speech API, you might see a transcript similar to:
Hi Alex, I am testing this browser based speech to text tool. It seems to handle simple sentences pretty well!
The exact output will vary, but you should get a readable sentence or two that require only minor edits. If the tool instead outputs unrelated words or stays blank, double-check that the language code matches the language you are speaking, and confirm that your microphone is not muted or blocked.
While this page is primarily a demo of the Web Speech API, it can be useful in several everyday scenarios:
The table below summarizes some typical trade-offs between manual keyboard entry and speech-based text input as demonstrated by this tool.
| Aspect | Manual Typing | Speech Recognition (this demo) |
|---|---|---|
| Speed for long text | Limited by typing skill; fast typists can be very efficient. | Often faster for rough drafts once you are comfortable speaking. |
| Accuracy without editing | High, especially for familiar vocabulary. | Variable; depends on noise, accent, and language model quality. |
| Hands-free operation | Not hands-free; requires keyboard access. | Yes; suitable when your hands are busy or fatigued. |
| Technical vocabulary | Reliable if you know how to spell the terms. | Often difficult; rare words may be misrecognized. |
| Privacy control on device | Keystrokes stay local. | Audio may be sent to browser or OS speech services for processing. |
| Accessibility | Requires fine motor control for typing. | Can assist users who have difficulty with keyboards. |
This demo intentionally focuses on a narrow, browser-based use case. The following limitations and assumptions are important to keep in mind:
The main controls are simple HTML buttons and form fields, so they are generally accessible to screen readers and keyboard users. You can tab between the Language input, Start Listening button, and Stop button, and activate each with the keyboard.
If you encounter problems, try the following checks:
With the right environment and settings, this transcriber can be a convenient way to explore speech recognition and speed up everyday dictation tasks directly in your browser.