Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) aim to tap the vast heat energy locked beneath Earth’s crust by artificially stimulating hot dry rock formations. Traditional schemes circulate water through injection and production wells, extracting heat to drive turbines. A newer concept uses supercritical carbon dioxide as the working fluid. Above its critical point at 31°C and 7.4 MPa, CO₂ behaves as a dense gas with liquid like solvating power and extremely low viscosity. These properties allow it to flow more easily through fine rock fractures, potentially accessing a larger portion of the reservoir while requiring less pumping energy. The high expansivity of supercritical CO₂ also generates self sustaining thermosiphon circulation: as the fluid heats up underground it becomes buoyant and rises through the production well without mechanical pumping, reducing parasitic loads. Adopting supercritical CO₂ additionally offers the enticing possibility of geologic carbon sequestration because a fraction of the injected fluid may remain trapped in the formation.
Before drilling wells two or three kilometers deep, developers need insight into the power potential of a given site and how changes in mass flow or reservoir temperature translate into grid electricity. The calculator above provides a streamlined assessment by computing the sensible heat extracted from the circulating carbon dioxide and applying a user selected conversion efficiency. The energy equation at the heart of the model is:
where P is the electrical power in kilowatts, ṁ denotes mass flow rate in kilograms per second, cp is the specific heat capacity of supercritical CO₂ expressed in kilojoules per kilogram kelvin, Tin and Tout represent the temperatures entering and leaving the turbine respectively and η captures the overall efficiency of converting thermal energy into electrical energy. Because cp is given in kilojoules, the product directly yields kilowatts when the temperature difference is in kelvins and mass flow in kilograms per second. The calculator further estimates annual energy production by multiplying the power by the capacity factor and the hours in a year, reporting the outcome in megawatt hours.
At pressures exceeding 10 MPa and temperatures above 50°C, the thermophysical properties of CO₂ change rapidly with small adjustments in conditions. The specific heat capacity peaks near the pseudo critical temperature, enabling efficient heat extraction. To assist with design considerations the table below lists representative property values for supercritical CO₂ at various temperatures and a pressure of 10 MPa. These values are approximate; engineers use detailed property databases for precise simulations.
Temperature (°C) | Density (kg/m³) | Specific Heat (kJ/kg·K) |
---|---|---|
50 | 570 | 2.5 |
100 | 400 | 1.5 |
150 | 300 | 1.2 |
200 | 220 | 1.0 |
The steep decline in density with temperature encourages natural circulation, a key advantage over water which maintains nearly constant density across this range. However the drop in specific heat means that hotter reservoirs do not proportionally increase power output unless mass flow also rises. Designers must balance these factors when selecting production and injection well spacings, pump sizes and surface equipment ratings. The calculator allows exploration of these sensitivities by adjusting the mass flow rate and temperatures. A lower reinjection temperature implies more heat extracted per unit mass but may risk thermal stress on the rock and increased mineral precipitation. High reinjection temperatures protect the reservoir but reduce the extractable energy, illustrating the tradeoffs inherent in EGS design.
Converting the thermal energy of supercritical CO₂ into electricity typically involves a surface power cycle such as an organic Rankine unit or a direct CO₂ Brayton turbine. Each stage introduces inefficiencies. Turbines operating with CO₂ must handle high pressures and corrosive conditions, requiring specialized materials and sealing techniques. Heat exchangers transfer energy from the produced fluid to the working fluid of the power cycle, and their effectiveness depends on approach temperature and fouling. The conversion efficiency parameter in the calculator aggregates all these losses into a single figure. Demonstration projects report values from 8 to 15 percent depending on reservoir temperature and technology maturity. Though modest compared to conventional geothermal water systems, these efficiencies can improve as materials and turbine designs evolve.
To illustrate the calculator’s use, imagine a reservoir delivering 80 kilograms per second of CO₂ at 160°C, returning at 60°C. With a specific heat capacity of 1.2 kJ/kg·K and a conversion efficiency of 13 percent, the tool estimates roughly 9,360 kilowatts of electrical power. Assuming a capacity factor of 90 percent, annual production approaches 74,000 megawatt hours, enough to power thousands of homes. Sensitivity analysis shows that increasing the mass flow by 25 percent raises power linearly, while boosting reservoir temperature by 20°C yields only a modest gain due to the falling specific heat. Such insights help developers decide whether to invest in additional wells to increase flow or to focus on accessing hotter rock.
Supercritical CO₂ EGS promises several benefits beyond power production. Because CO₂ is miscible with many hydrocarbons, circulating it through certain formations can mobilize trapped oil, offering a potential revenue stream that offsets drilling costs. The closed loop also keeps the working fluid separate from groundwater, reducing contamination risk. Furthermore, injecting large quantities of CO₂ underground contributes to carbon sequestration, and the buoyancy driven flow may allow some projects to operate without surface pumps, saving parasitic energy. On the challenge side, corrosion and material compatibility require careful alloy selection and inhibitor programs. The subsurface behavior of supercritical CO₂ is complex; it can dissolve minerals or precipitate solids, altering permeability over time. Monitoring and controlling the plume to prevent leakage through faults or abandoned wells demands comprehensive geophysical surveys.
Policy and regulatory frameworks also influence deployment. Many jurisdictions classify CO₂ injection wells differently from water wells, introducing additional permitting hurdles. Public perception of seismicity induced by reservoir stimulation must be managed through transparent risk communication. The cost of drilling multiple deep wells remains the largest barrier, although co production with oil and gas operations may leverage existing infrastructure. The calculator does not capture these economic and regulatory nuances but serves as a technical foundation from which feasibility studies can expand.
To operate the calculator, input the expected mass flow rate based on reservoir transmissivity and pumping plans. Enter the anticipated temperature of the fluid at the production wellhead and the target reinjection temperature after heat extraction. The specific heat defaults to 1.1 kJ/kg·K but can be modified to reflect detailed property calculations at the operating pressure. Set the conversion efficiency to represent the combined turbine and heat exchanger performance. The capacity factor accounts for downtime due to maintenance or resource depletion and should be less than one hundred percent. Upon calculation the tool reports the instantaneous electrical power as well as annual energy production. The result field can be copied for documentation or further analysis.
The simplified model intentionally omits pressure drop calculations, reservoir thermal depletion, non ideal heat transfer and parasitic loads from auxiliary systems. Nevertheless it gives engineers, students and investors a transparent means of approximating the benefits of supercritical CO₂ geothermal technology. By experimenting with parameter variations users can build intuition about the most influential factors and identify promising avenues for deeper investigation such as numerical reservoir simulation or techno economic modeling. The ability to estimate potential grid contributions with only a handful of inputs underscores the immense promise of tapping Earth’s heat with carbon dioxide.
Estimate the equilibrium constant for a reaction from reactant and product concentrations.
Compute discharge duration of a molten salt thermal energy storage system using volume, temperatures, heat capacity and plant power draw.
Plan ideal melting, cooling, and working temperatures for dark, milk, or white chocolate.