Many functions in calculus and complex analysis can be written as power series
f(z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n (z - z_0)^n.
The radius of convergence, usually written as R, is the radius of the largest open disc around the center (here typically z_0 = 0) on which this series converges absolutely. In other words, the series converges for all complex numbers z with |z| < R, and it diverges for all |z| > R. On the boundary |z| = R, the behavior can be mixed: some points may give convergence and others divergence.
Understanding the radius of convergence is essential when you work with Taylor or Maclaurin series, solve differential equations using power series, or approximate analytic functions numerically.
There are two standard tools for finding the radius of convergence of a power series: the root test and the ratio test.
For a series
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n z^n,
the root test gives the radius of convergence as
In plain words: take the limit superior of the sequence |a_n|^{1/n} as n goes to infinity, and then take the reciprocal. That reciprocal is the radius of convergence. If the limit superior is zero, the radius is infinite; if the limit superior is infinite, the radius is zero.
When the ratios of consecutive coefficients behave nicely, the ratio test is often easier to apply. If the limit
L = lim_{n \to \infty} |a_{n+1} / a_n|
exists, then the radius of convergence is
R = 1 / L (with the usual conventions: if L = 0, then R = \infty; if L = \infty, then R = 0).
Textbooks commonly ask, โHow do you find the radius of convergence of a power series?โ and then demonstrate either the root test or the ratio test, depending on the structure of the coefficients.
In practice, you rarely have access to all infinitely many coefficients a_n. Instead, you may know only a finite list, either from a symbolic computation or a numerical procedure. This calculator takes that finite list and uses a numerical version of the root test to approximate the limit superior in the formula above.
Suppose you enter coefficients up to index N, so you have
a_0, a_1, a_2, \dots, a_N.
The calculator performs the following steps:
k with a nonzero coefficient, it computes the absolute value |a_k|.k-th root |a_k|^{1/k} for k \ge 1.R.As you supply more coefficients, this finite approximation usually moves closer to the true radius, especially when the coefficients settle into a regular pattern (for example, factorial growth or a simple geometric factor).
The input field accepts a comma-separated list of coefficients for a power series centered at 0:
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n z^n.
a_0. Use commas to separate them, for example:1, -1/2, 1/3, -1/4.1/3, integers, and decimal numbers like 0.25.a_0, a_1, a_2, \dots, applies the numerical root-test approach, and outputs an estimated radius of convergence R.R is large, the series converges on a wide disc; if it is small, the disc of convergence is narrow.Once you have an estimate for R, it helps to connect it to several related ideas:
|z| < R.x, the series converges for |x| < R. On the interval endpoints x = \pm R, you must test convergence separately. The set of real x for which the series converges is called the interval of convergence, while R is just its radius when measured from 0.Consider the geometric series
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} z^n = 1 + z + z^2 + z^3 + \cdots.
Here, all coefficients are a_n = 1. The exact theory says this series converges if and only if |z| < 1, so the true radius of convergence is R = 1.
To approximate this using the calculator, you could enter a finite list like
1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1.
For each nonzero coefficient, we have |a_k|^{1/k} = 1^{1/k} = 1, so the maximum root is 1, and the estimated radius is its reciprocal, which is also 1. In this case, the numerical method recovers the exact value even from a short list of coefficients.
Now look at the series
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} n! z^n.
The coefficients grow very quickly: a_n = n!. Using the ratio test, we have
|a_{n+1} / a_n| = (n+1)! / n! = n+1, which tends to infinity as n \to \infty. Therefore, L = \infty and the exact radius of convergence is R = 0. The series diverges for every nonzero z.
If you enter a few terms, for example
1, 1, 2, 6, 24, 120
corresponding to 0!, 1!, 2!, 3!, 4!, 5!, the calculator computes |a_k|^{1/k} for k \ge 1. These roots get larger as k increases, and the maximum root becomes quite big even for a short list. The reciprocal of that maximum is then very small, providing a numerical estimate that the radius is near zero, in agreement with the exact theory.
| Method | Key quantity | Formula for R | When it is most useful |
|---|---|---|---|
| Root test | \limsup_{n \to \infty} |a_n|^{1/n} |
R = 1 / \limsup |a_n|^{1/n} |
General series, especially when you know or can estimate the overall growth rate of a_n. |
| Ratio test | \lim_{n \to \infty} |a_{n+1} / a_n| (if it exists) |
R = 1 / \lim |a_{n+1} / a_n| |
Series with simple recurrence relations or factorial/polynomial patterns in the coefficients. |
| Calculator here | Finite-sample maximum of |a_k|^{1/k} |
R \approx 1 / \max_k |a_k|^{1/k} |
Numerical experiments, series defined by data, or quick intuition when an exact symbolic computation is difficult. |
This tool is designed as an educational and exploratory aid rather than a formal proof engine. Its estimate of the radius of convergence relies on several important assumptions and has some limitations you should keep in mind:
|a_k|^{1/k} may not reflect the true long-term behavior. The estimate can then be misleading.z), the tool skips undefined roots (like 0^{1/0}) and works with indices where k \ge 1. This is usually harmless, but you should be aware of how the indexing aligns with your symbolic formula.n tends to infinity. The calculator replaces this with a maximum over finitely many terms, so it always produces an approximation, not a guarantee.z_0, you can still use the tool by shifting variables or simply remembering that the disc of convergence is centered at z_0 with radius R.If the numerical result conflicts with what you expect from theory, double-check the coefficients, add more terms if possible, and consider applying the exact root or ratio tests by hand as a comparison.
This radius of convergence calculator is intended for students in calculus, real analysis, or complex analysis courses, as well as practitioners who encounter power series in applied work. It helps you:
Used alongside formal methods (root test, ratio test, or knowledge of singularities), it provides quick, visual feedback on the convergence behavior of your power series.
Separate coefficients with commas. Include more than one term for better estimates.