The Altman Z-Score is a widely used financial metric that blends several balance sheet and income statement ratios to estimate the probability of corporate bankruptcy. Developed in the late 1960s by Edward Altman, the model has endured for decades because it captures multiple dimensions of solvency in a single standardized figure. At its core, the score represents a weighted combination of five financial ratios, each selected for its ability to differentiate distressed firms from healthy ones. The first ratio measures working capital relative to total assets, highlighting liquidity. The second reflects retained earnings to total assets, capturing cumulative profitability. The third, earnings before interest and taxes to total assets, signals operational earning power. The fourth, market value of equity to total liabilities, gauges leverage and market confidence. Finally, sales to total assets assesses asset turnover. By weighting these components and summing them, the Z-Score produces a number that helps analysts quickly categorize a firm’s financial health.
The model has proved remarkably robust across industries, although Altman later proposed variants to accommodate private firms and non-manufacturers. In its original form, which this calculator implements, the coefficients were derived from a statistical analysis of manufacturing companies, but the framework remains useful for a broad range of businesses. The final score falls into one of three zones. A value above 2.99 indicates the company is in the “safe” zone with a low risk of bankruptcy. Scores between 1.81 and 2.99 place the firm in a grey area where careful monitoring is warranted. A score below 1.81 signals significant distress and a heightened likelihood of insolvency. The boundaries are not absolute; they are guidelines derived from historical data. Yet the simplicity of the model and its empirical grounding make it a popular starting point for credit analysis, investment screening, and academic research.
The strength of the Altman Z-Score lies in its ability to synthesize diverse aspects of financial performance. Liquidity, profitability, leverage, and efficiency are all encapsulated. Analysts often use the model as a preliminary filter before conducting deeper due diligence. For example, an investor evaluating a portfolio of potential acquisitions might run each candidate through the Z-Score. Companies falling into the distress zone may warrant further scrutiny or exclusion from consideration. Creditors, likewise, can apply the metric to assess loan applicants. Because the inputs are standard financial statement items, the calculation can be performed quickly without sophisticated software or proprietary data.
However, it is important to understand the limitations of the model. Since the original coefficients were calibrated using data from the 1960s, they may not fully capture contemporary business dynamics, particularly in technology-driven sectors where asset-light models predominate. The model also relies on accounting figures, which can be influenced by management’s discretion in reporting and subject to timing differences. Market value of equity, one of the inputs, can fluctuate rapidly in volatile markets, potentially producing erratic Z-Scores. Moreover, the model does not account for qualitative factors such as management expertise, competitive landscape, or regulatory risk. As a result, the Altman Z-Score should be considered a supplement to, not a substitute for, comprehensive financial analysis.
To give a sense of how each component contributes, consider a hypothetical company with $500,000 in working capital, $1,200,000 in retained earnings, $800,000 in EBIT, $2,500,000 market value of equity, $1,400,000 in total liabilities, $3,600,000 in sales, and $4,000,000 in total assets. First, divide each numerator by total assets or liabilities as appropriate. Working capital over total assets equals 0.125. Retained earnings over total assets equals 0.3. EBIT over total assets equals 0.2. Market value of equity over total liabilities equals about 1.786. Sales over total assets equals 0.9. The Z-Score is computed as 1.2 times 0.125 plus 1.4 times 0.3 plus 3.3 times 0.2 plus 0.6 times 1.786 plus 1.0 times 0.9. Summing the weighted components yields approximately 3.43, placing the firm comfortably in the safe zone.
The mathematical representation of the Altman Z-Score can be expressed succinctly using MathML:
In this expression, represents working capital, retained earnings, earnings before interest and taxes, the market value of equity, total liabilities, net sales, and total assets. Each component is scaled by its respective coefficient before being summed to arrive at the final score.
The following table summarizes the five ratios used in the computation along with their coefficients and interpretations:
| Component | Ratio | Coefficient | Insight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquidity | Working Capital / Total Assets | 1.2 | Ability to meet short-term obligations |
| Cumulative Profitability | Retained Earnings / Total Assets | 1.4 | Internal funding and historical performance |
| Earning Power | EBIT / Total Assets | 3.3 | Operating efficiency |
| Leverage | Market Value Equity / Total Liabilities | 0.6 | Market’s assessment of solvency |
| Asset Turnover | Sales / Total Assets | 1.0 | Revenue generation from assets |
To employ the calculator, input the seven financial statement figures into the form fields. The script divides each numerator by total assets or liabilities as required and applies the Altman coefficients. The resulting Z-Score appears along with a textual classification of the financial health zone. This immediate feedback enables rapid scenario analysis: you can adjust assumptions about earnings, leverage, or sales to observe how each factor influences the score. Such experimentation can be helpful when planning strategic initiatives, negotiating financing terms, or evaluating acquisition targets.
While the Z-Score offers valuable insights, it should be incorporated into a broader analytical framework. Investors might combine it with cash flow analysis, industry outlook assessments, and management evaluations. Credit analysts often consider additional ratios such as interest coverage, debt service coverage, or free cash flow to debt. For distressed companies, qualitative factors like restructuring plans and legal protections can be just as critical as the numerical score. Nevertheless, the Altman Z-Score remains a powerful, easy-to-compute indicator that serves as an early warning system for financial deterioration and provides a common language for discussing credit risk.
Calculate printing expenses by entering cartridge price, pages per cartridge, and expected monthly pages. Understand your real cost per page.
Estimate tax savings from contributing to a flexible spending account. See how pre-tax FSA dollars reduce income and payroll taxes.
Compute basic and diluted earnings per share from net income, preferred dividends, and weighted average shares.