Earthquakes release energy as seismic waves that travel through the Earth and are recorded by sensitive instruments called seismographs. To compare the overall size of different earthquakes, seismologists use magnitude scales. One of the earliest and most widely known is the local magnitude scale, commonly called the Richter scale after Charles F. Richter, who introduced it in the 1930s.
The Richter scale was designed to work with a standard type of seismograph and to measure earthquakes that occurred within a few hundred kilometers of the instrument. It converts the maximum wave amplitude recorded on the seismogram into a single number that roughly reflects how large the earthquake was at its source. Because this is a logarithmic scale, each whole number increase in magnitude represents a large jump in shaking amplitude and an even larger jump in energy released.
Today, professional seismologists often use more modern scales, such as moment magnitude (Mw), especially for large or distant earthquakes. However, the Richter formulation remains useful in education and for approximate local comparisons. The calculator on this page applies a commonly taught local magnitude equation to estimate earthquake size from the wave amplitude and the distance between the seismograph and the epicenter.
The calculator estimates the local (Richter) magnitude M from two inputs:
A commonly used form of the local magnitude formula is:
M = log10(A) + 3 log10(8D) − 2.92
In mathematical notation, the same relationship can be written as:
where:
The first term, log10(A), reflects the fact that larger shaking amplitudes correspond to larger magnitudes. The second term, 3 log10(8D), accounts for the approximate way in which seismic waves spread out and lose strength as they travel away from the source. The constant −2.92 calibrates the scale so that it matches the original Richter reference events and instruments.
Because the equation is logarithmic, even modest-looking changes in magnitude represent large differences in measured amplitude. A magnitude 5 earthquake has waves with ten times the amplitude of a magnitude 4 quake, and a magnitude 6 event has waves with one hundred times the amplitude of a magnitude 4 event, all else being equal.
The output of this calculator is an approximate local magnitude M for the earthquake that produced the recorded amplitude at the given distance. This number is dimensionless and is not an intensity rating or a direct damage prediction. Instead, it is a standardized measure of how big the earthquake was at its source, derived from how strongly the ground shook at the instrument.
Typical approximate interpretations for local magnitude values are:
These ranges are rule-of-thumb categories. The actual impact of any specific event depends heavily on factors such as depth, distance from populated areas, local geology, and building practices.
Suppose a seismograph records a maximum wave amplitude of 5 mm from an earthquake whose epicenter is approximately 20 km away. Using the formula above:
Start with the amplitude term:
log10(5) ≈ 0.699
Compute the distance-related term:
First find 8D = 8 × 20 = 160 km, then
log10(160) ≈ 2.204.
Multiply by 3:
3 × 2.204 ≈ 6.612.
Add the two logarithmic parts together and subtract the constant:
M = 0.699 + 6.612 − 2.92
M ≈ 4.391
Using slightly different rounding at each step or a different reference formulation may yield a somewhat different example value (for instance, some simplified examples give a result near M ≈ 3.3). The key point is that moderate changes in recorded amplitude or distance can noticeably shift the estimated magnitude.
With the calculator, you can adjust the amplitude and distance inputs and immediately see how these changes affect the estimated local magnitude. This is especially helpful for visualizing the logarithmic behavior of the Richter scale.
An important distinction is that magnitude is not the same as intensity or damage. The calculator reports a magnitude value, which is a property of the earthquake source, derived from instrument readings. Human experience and damage on the ground are described by intensity scales, such as the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale, which ranges from barely felt to extreme devastation.
Two earthquakes with the same magnitude can produce very different levels of shaking and damage in different places. For example, a magnitude 6 event beneath a sparsely populated, well-prepared region may cause limited damage, while a similar-magnitude event under a dense city with vulnerable buildings can be much more destructive. Depth, distance, local soil conditions, and construction quality all play major roles in how shaking is experienced.
You can think of magnitude as a standardized estimate of the earthquake’s size at its source, while intensity and damage describe the effects in particular locations.
The table below summarizes common magnitude ranges, approximate frequency, and very general expectations about felt shaking and potential damage. These are broad guidelines only, not predictions.
| Magnitude range (M) | Typical description | General effects near epicenter |
|---|---|---|
| < 2.0 | Micro | Usually not felt; detected only by instruments. |
| 2.0 – 3.9 | Minor | Often felt by people near the epicenter; rarely causes damage. |
| 4.0 – 4.9 | Light | Noticeable shaking indoors; small risk of minor local damage. |
| 5.0 – 5.9 | Moderate | Can cause damage to weak structures; can be frightening to those nearby. |
| 6.0 – 6.9 | Strong | Serious damage possible in populated regions, particularly with vulnerable buildings. |
| 7.0 – 7.9 | Major | Widespread damage over large areas; potential for severe impact in cities. |
| ≥ 8.0 | Great | Massive earthquakes affecting very large regions; can be catastrophic. |
Again, these are generalized categories. Actual outcomes depend on many local and regional factors. Use the magnitude estimate from this calculator as an educational reference, not as a damage forecast.
The local magnitude formula used here is a simplified model. It makes several important assumptions and comes with clear limitations:
For these reasons, this tool is best understood as an educational approximation. It is useful for exploring how seismogram amplitudes and distance influence local magnitude estimates and for gaining intuition about the logarithmic nature of magnitude scales.
This calculator is not a substitute for professional seismic analysis, official hazard assessments, or emergency guidance. If you are in an area affected by an earthquake, always follow directions from local authorities and official agencies.
When Charles F. Richter and his colleagues introduced the local magnitude scale in the 1930s, it was a major step forward for seismology. For the first time, researchers had a consistent, quantitative way to compare earthquakes recorded on standardized instruments over a defined region. The idea of assigning a single, logarithmic magnitude number also made earthquakes easier to communicate to journalists and the public.
Over time, seismologists recognized that the original Richter formulation was limited by the instruments, frequency band, and region for which it was designed. To handle deeper, larger, and more distant earthquakes, several new scales were introduced, culminating in the now widely used moment magnitude (Mw). Moment magnitude is derived from the physical properties of the fault rupture: the area that slipped, the amount of slip, and the rigidity of the rocks involved.
Even though moment magnitude has largely replaced the Richter scale in professional practice, the term “Richter scale” is still commonly used in everyday language to mean “earthquake magnitude.” The calculator on this page specifically implements a local magnitude-style equation and should be interpreted within that context.
The estimate is as accurate as the underlying assumptions allow. If your amplitude measurement is precise, the distance to the epicenter is well known, and the event falls within the intended range of the local magnitude scale, the result can be a reasonable approximation. However, professionals typically use multiple stations, frequency corrections, and more advanced processing to determine official magnitudes. Expect this tool to provide an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than an official value.
Local (Richter) magnitude is based on the maximum amplitude recorded by a particular type of seismograph at a given distance. Moment magnitude, by contrast, is based on the total seismic moment of the rupture, which depends on the fault area, average slip, and rock rigidity. For small to moderate earthquakes, Richter and moment magnitudes often agree fairly well, but for large earthquakes, Richter values saturate while moment magnitude continues to increase and better reflects the true size of the event.
In general, earthquakes below about M 2.0 are rarely felt. Events in the range M 2.0–3.0 may be felt by people very close to the epicenter, especially in quiet environments. Earthquakes around M 3.0–4.0 are more commonly felt as a quick jolt or a brief rumble, while those in the M 4.0–5.0 range can produce noticeable shaking indoors. Whether people feel an event also depends on depth, distance, and local conditions.
No. The calculator only estimates a local magnitude from wave amplitude and distance. It does not model building performance, local site amplification, or secondary hazards. Use it as a learning tool to understand how seismologists relate seismogram readings to magnitude, not as a basis for safety decisions. For real events, rely on official information from geological surveys and emergency management agencies.
By experimenting with different amplitudes and distances, you can build intuition about how magnitude relates to measured shaking and why a logarithmic scale is necessary to cover the full range of earthquake sizes. Remember, however, that real-world seismology relies on networks of instruments, sophisticated analysis, and expert judgment.
Treat the results as a rough, educational guide. If you are curious about how much energy different magnitudes represent, or how magnitude relates to tsunami potential, consider consulting detailed resources from national geological surveys or academic institutions for deeper study.